Gender, education and health programmes cut in FCDO’s UK aid allocations for 25/26 

Yesterday, Tuesday 22 July, the Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) released its Annual Report & Accounts for 2024–25 and the equality impact assessment of Official Development Assistance (ODA) programme allocations for 2025 to 2026.

The report contains forward-looking budgets for the current financial year (2024-25) and reported figures for UK aid spending for 2023-24, but it does not contain projected budgets for 2026-27.

Bilateral spending for Africa, the Middle East, gender, education and health programmes will face cuts in 25/26.

Key points of interest from the equality impact assessment and when comparing the 2024-25 annual report with the 2023-24 report, include:

Other allocations to note:

  • Europe has seen a 47% increase from £25mn in 2023/24 to £37mn in 2024/25, and will see a further 29% increase to £47.8mn in 2025/26.
  • Eastern Europe and Central Asia (which includes Ukraine) has seen an increase by 5% from £251mn in 2023/24 to £263mn in 2024/25, and will see a further small increase of 2% to £268mn in 2025/26.
  • Americas and Overseas Territories have seen a 59% increase from £105mn in 2023/24 to £167mn in 2024/25, and will see a further increase by 42% to £237mn in 2025/26.
  • Indo Pacific has seen a 45% increase from £185.6mn in 2023/24 to £269mn in 2024/25, and will see a further 32% increase to £354.5mn in 2025/26.

In reaction, Gideon Rabinowitz, Director of Policy and Advocacy at Bond, the UK network for organisations working in international development and humanitarian assistance, said:

While we welcome the government’s efforts to maintain consistent levels of funding for humanitarian crises, Gavi and the World Bank’s IDA fund, it is concerning that bilateral funding for Africa, gender, education and health programmes will drop.

Following the late publication of the FCDO’s annual report and allocations today, it is clear that the government is deprioritising funding for education, gender and countries experiencing humanitarian crises such as South Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia, and surprisingly the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Sudan which the government said would be protected.

The world’s most marginalised communities, particularly those experiencing conflict and women and girls, will pay the highest price for these political choices. At a time when the US has gutted all gender programming, the UK should be stepping up, not stepping back.

While the government has published an impact assessment for this year, we are only seeing relatively small cuts before larger cuts are implemented from 2026/27 onwards. It is imperative they publish an impact assessment for each year they implement cuts and explain how these decisions align with UK aid’s intended purpose, to support communities in lower-income countries who face poverty, conflict and climate change. Without this, we only have a very limited picture of what the real impact is going to be on the areas facing the brunt of the cuts.

ENDS.

Notes for editors

For further information or interviews, please contact Jess Salter at [email protected] or call 07392972411