Learning to like logframes
I use a logical framework approach to project planning as a 'safe container' for the creative process. The logframe is a matrix, and the word 'matrix' comes from the Latin = breeding female, womb, from mater matris ‘mother'. It is essentially a place of formation, an ‘environment or substance in which a thing is created' (from The Concise Oxford Dictionary).
I believe the perceived inflexibility of these frameworks stems from either a poor understanding of planning procedures coupled with limited facilitation skills, and/or the formulation of logical frameworks initially at the wrong end of the stakeholder chain, e.g. by an NGO fundraiser putting together a funding proposal against a tight deadline with inadequate information from the field.
I personally have a very different experience of using logical frameworks, having used this method successfully in India through several project life-cycles. Over the past ten years I have been developing methods and models for facilitating large representative groups of project stakeholders - including primary beneficiaries - using the logical framework as a container for a joint creative planning process, that is accessible and therefore can be contributed to, at every link in the stakeholder chain.
A joint creative planning process
The groups will usually have sub-groups and each brings something different to the process, so they are able to separately formulate their own part in the project within a joint vision for the whole. The logframe approach then facilitates the bringing together of all the ideas, aspirations, skills and resources in a coherent way, so that everyone involved can see where their contributions fit within the bigger picture.
It is possible to make its terminology very simple when working with beneficiaries for whom English is not their mother tongue, and to use imagery, myth and symbol to draw out the individual and collective visions, actions and measurements of success, required for project planning.
I have found it a tool which lends itself to flexibility, transparency and the building of responsive - and responsible relationships between all participants in a process where every participant has an opportunity to play an equal part. Sensitivity to group process coupled with in depth knowledge of planning processes has been the key to success of this method.
